KINGSTON SE100S37200G SSD WINDOWS VISTA DRIVER DOWNLOAD

KINGSTON SE100S37200G SSD DRIVER DETAILS:

Type: Driver
File Name: kingston_se100s37200g_22685.zip
File Size: 26.5 MB
Rating:
4.66
68 (4.66)
Downloads: 55
Supported systems: Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 8, Windows 7, Windows 2008, Windows Vista
Price: Free* (*Free Registration Required)

Download Now
KINGSTON SE100S37200G SSD DRIVER



While max latency shows the absolute worst response times over the duration of the testing period, looking instead Kingston SE100S37200G SSD standard deviation paints a better picture for how consistent the response times were from the Kingston E Overall the E came in middle of the pack, right up against the Kage K1.

Your browser security needs to be updated

In this area the Kingston offered a boost in performance compared to the Kage K1 Kingston SE100S37200G SSD, following an identical performance curve. The E was able to keep average latency suppressed at load levels lower than an effective queue depth of 32, where the queue depth limit of the SATA interface came in.

  • Kingston SSDNow E SSD (GB) Overview - CNET
  • Kingston SSDNow E Enterprise Solid State SES37/G
  • SSDNow E Solid State Drive - GBGB Kingston
  • Technical Details
  • Kingston SSDNow E100 200GB Internal 2.5" (SE100S37/200G) SSD

Kingston SE100S37200G SSD Standard deviation on the E was consistent on all effective queue depths below 32, although it was still able to keep latency in check compared to the Intel SSD It offers a slight lead over the KAge K1 throughout the entire preconditioning phase. Average latency over the duration of the File Server preconditioning process had the Kingston E with a small edge over the Kage K1.

The E was able to keep average latency suppressed at load levels lower than an effective queue depth of 32, where the Kingston SE100S37200G SSD depth Kingston SE100S37200G SSD of its SATA interface came into play. Switching focus to standard deviation, the Kingston E kept latency consistent upwards to an effect queue depth of 32, where it went up dramatically.

For this reason results will appear much lower in this first section. Comparing average latency, we see one large spike from the SM early into the test, with the Kingston E starting to level off in our saturation test between hours in. Max latency spikes from both of the eMLC SandForce Kingston SE100S37200G SSD came in at the middle of the group, Kingston SE100S37200G SSD in the band between ms, whereas the Samsung or Hitachi models measured ms.

KINGSTON SE100S37200G SSD DRIVERS FOR WINDOWS XP

The Intel SSD was on the other end of Kingston SE100S37200G SSD spectrum, measuring ms once it reached steady state. The E was able to keep average latency suppressed at load levels lower than an effective queue depth of 32, where the queue depth limit of the SATA interface came in.

Standard deviation on the E was consistent on all effective queue depths below 32, although it was still able to keep latency in check compared to the Intel SSD It offers a slight lead over the KAge K1 throughout the entire preconditioning phase. Kingston SE100S37200G SSD latency over the duration of the File Server preconditioning process had the Kingston E with a small edge over the Kage K1.

Kingston SSDNow E GB Internal " (SES37/G) SSD eBay

The E was able to keep average latency suppressed at load levels lower than an effective queue depth Kingston SE100S37200G SSD 32, where the queue depth limit of its SATA interface came into play. Switching focus to standard deviation, the Kingston E kept latency consistent upwards to an effect queue depth of 32, where it went up dramatically.

KINGSTON SE100S37200G SSD DRIVER WINDOWS 7 (2019)

For this reason results will appear Kingston SE100S37200G SSD lower in this first section. Comparing average latency, we see one large spike from the SM early into the test, with the Kingston E starting to level off in our saturation test between hours in. Max latency spikes from both of the eMLC SandForce models came in at the middle of the group, contained in the band between ms, whereas the Samsung or Hitachi models measured ms. The Intel SSD was on the other end of the spectrum, measuring ms once it reached steady state.

The E offered the highest transfer speeds in conditions where the load stayed at or below an effective queue depth of Average latency showed the Kingston E maintained its cool fairly well over the different loads, up until the point where it surpassed an effective queue depth of At that stage average latency shot up dramatically, which was the norm for this group. E offers 10X endurance over typical client SSDs, with 30K program/erase cycles on E vs. Kingston SE100S37200G SSD program/erase cycles on client features an SF SES37/G.

Kingston SSDNow E Enterprise SSD Review - Storage Reviews

SES37/G. SSDNow E KINGSTON PART NUMBERS. 1 Some of the listed capacity on a Flash storage device is used for formatting.

Related Posts